Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Citation
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-01-28
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
- Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Full Text
2,802 charsrenew and that the plaintiff was providing ‘‘the required
written notice to vacate the premises as stated in your
current [l]ease.’’ The defendant did not vacate. The
plaintiff then commenced a summary process action
(first action) against the defendant, alleging, inter alia,
lapse of time, with return of service on April 9, 2022.
The defendant filed an answer and a special defense
pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-23c.3 The first action
concluded on May 26, 2022, when the court rendered
a judgment of possession in favor of the defendant,
who the court found had proved her special defense that
she is entitled to the protections provided by § 47a-23c.
On December 27, 2022, the plaintiff sent the defen-
dant a letter notifying her that it would be increasing
her rent to $1300 per month, effective February 1, 2023.
Since the inception of the lease in 2012, the defendant
has continued to pay the same rental amount of $1200
per month without increase. This letter also apprised
the defendant that a previous notice to quit from
November, 2022, was ‘‘rescinded and no longer has any
legal effect.’’4 It went on to notify the defendant that
‘‘[t]his notice is to advise you that you are in violation of
your lease and/or rental agreement and your obligations
3
General Statutes § 47a-23c prohibits eviction of certain tenants with
physical or mental disability except for good cause, which is defined in
subdivision (b) (1). Although the court found, in the first action, that the
term of the lease had terminated, the court also determined that, because
the defendant is protected by statute, she could not be evicted for lapse
of time.
4
The November 17, 2022 notice to quit read, in substance, as follows: ‘‘I
hereby give notice that you are to quit possession or occupancy of the
premises described above and now occupied by you on or before November
27, 2022 for the following reasons:
‘‘(1) Nonpayment of rent.
‘‘(2) Although you previously had a right or privilege to occupy the prem-
ises, said right or privilege has terminated.
‘‘Any payments tendered after service of this Notice shall be accepted as
‘USE and OCCUPANCY’ and NOT as rent. You may be evicted only if the
landlord brings a judicial action against you and in said action you may
present a defense.’’ (Emphasis in original.)
0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3