Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Citation: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Parent Document: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10320924/brook-run-development-corp-v-noon/ ↗

Full Text

694 chars

doctrine of collateral estoppel bars the defendant’s claim that the lease was
         not terminated. The defendant disagrees, arguing that the first action does
         not bar this issue from being relitigated because whether the lease had
         terminated was not ‘‘essential to the decision in th[at] case’’ because the
         court found for the defendant, holding that she could not be evicted for
         lapse of time due to her protected status under § 47a-23c. In light of our
         resolution of the merits of the claim advanced by the defendant, we do not
         reach that alternative ground.
0, 0                    CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                     Page 7

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text