Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford, 350 Conn. 347 (2024)

Citation
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford, 350 Conn. 347 (2024)
Parent Document
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford, 350 Conn. 347 (2024)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2024-08-12

Other Sections in This Document (198)

Full Text

2,685 chars
plaintiff contends that § 8-270a permits it to assert, in
          support of its application to discharge the lien, that the
          plaintiff cannot be liable under § 47a-7 because it did
          not cause the fire that displaced the tenants. In
          response, the defendant contends that the plaintiff can-
          not apply to discharge the lien because § 8-270a makes
          clear that a § 47a-7 argument is available only as an
          affirmative defense to a civil action filed by a municipal-
          ity to recover from a landlord payment the municipality
          has made on behalf of displaced residents. We agree
          with the defendant.
             As we did in part I of this opinion, we exercise plenary
          review over the trial court’s interpretation of §§ 8-268,
          8-270 and 8-270a. The plain meaning rule continues to
          guide this portion of our analysis. See General Statutes
          § 1-2z; Gilmore v. Pawn King, Inc., supra, 313 Conn.
          542–43. In addition, we note that, ‘‘if possible, the com-
          ponent parts of a statute should be construed harmoni-
          ously in order to render an overall reasonable
          interpretation.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
          Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 278
          Conn. 326, 333, 898 A.2d 170 (2006). However, we can-
          not go so far as to import additional provisions into
          statutory schemes in an effort to create greater harmony
          or consistency than the terms of the statute permit.
          See, e.g., Battersby v. Battersby, 218 Conn. 467, 470,
          590 A.2d 427 (1991) (‘‘When language used in a statute
          is clear and unambiguous, its meaning is not subject
          to modification or construction. . . . Absent ambigu-
          premises with his consent, in which case such duty shall be the responsibility
          of the tenant; (3) keep all common areas of the premises in a clean and
          safe condition; (4) maintain in good and safe working order and condition
          all electrical, plumbing, sanitary, heating, ventilating and other facilities and
          appliances and elevators, supplied or required to be supplied by him; (5)
          provide and maintain appropriate receptacles for the removal of ashes,
          garbage, rubbish and other waste incidental to the occupancy of the dwelling
          unit and arrange for their removal; and (6) supply running water and reason-
          able amounts of hot water at all times and reasonable heat . . . .’’
November 5, 2024         CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                       Page 13