DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 18

Citation
Section 18
Parent Document
Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2000-02-11
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8353877/mogilevsky-v-keating/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text

498 chars 
For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, as pertaining to Doris Keating in VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI and is GRANTED as to all other Defendants (Peter Keating, Keating & Co., Inc., 78 Charles Street Realty Corp. d/b/a/ Street & Company and J. Brooks Porter) for Count VI. In regards to the Pond Realty Trust, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts I, n, HI, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X and is DENIED as to Counts VIII and XI.