Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)

Citation: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Parent Document: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2000-02-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8353877/mogilevsky-v-keating/ ↗

Full Text

1,091 chars

Mogilevsky complained to the Landlord about the insufficient heat and other problems with the apartment both orally and in writing, though exact dates are not provided. (Id. at ¶19.) On several occasions, though Mogilevsky does not say on what dates, defendants Keating and Porter responded to Mogilevsky’s complaints with derogatory comments such as, since Mogilevsky was Russian, he should be used to the cold, and Keating said Mogilevsky complained “like an old Jew.” (Id. at ¶20.) Keating, however, assured Mogilevsky that: his heating would be corrected; his kitchen would be renovated; the building’s insulation would be improved; the laundry facilities would be vented properly; and that Mogilevsky would continue to be the supervisor of the property after the renovations were completed. (Id. at ¶¶24, 25.) As the renovations progressed, it became clear to Mogilevsky that none of the renovations promised by the Defendants would come to pass. (Id. at ¶26.) Mogilevsky again complained about the deficiencies in the apartment and the Defendants’ failure to honor the agreement. (Id.)

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text