Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)

Citation: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Parent Document: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2000-02-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8353877/mogilevsky-v-keating/ ↗

Full Text

611 chars

During Mogilevsky’s first winter in the apartment, the natural gas stove was sealed by the gas company because of the dangerous condition it posed. (Id. at ¶ 12.) For the next four years, Mogilevsky had insufficient heat. [Id. at ¶ 13.) In addition, during the winter of October 1997 to February 1998, Mogilevsky had no hot water and no water at all in his kitchen sink. (Id. at ¶ 15.) In addition, a washer and dryer installed near his apartment were not properly vented and Mogilevsky suffered from the fumes, gases and moisture. (Id. at ¶14.) Further, insulation in the building was inadequate. (Id. at ¶16.)

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text