Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)

Citation: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Parent Document: Mogilevsky v. Keating, 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 332 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2000-02-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8353877/mogilevsky-v-keating/ ↗

Full Text

724 chars

Lopez, J.
The plaintiff, Boris Mogilevsky (“Mogilevsky”), brought this action against his former employer and landlord, defendants Doris Keating (“Keating”), Peter Keating, 78 Charles Street Realty Corp., d/b/a Street & Company, and J. Brooks Porter (collectively, “Landlord” or “Defendants”) alleging discrimination and retaliation, inter alia, for the substandard housing he received in exchange for superintendent responsibilities. On January 5, 2000, this matter was before the court for a hearing on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.3 After hearing, and upon consideration of the memoranda and arguments of counsel, the defendants’ motion is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text