section 17980

Citation: section 17980
Parent Document: City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2008-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2567465/city-of-santa-monica-v-gonzalez/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (159)

City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980

Full Text

470 chars

The foregoing history undermines any contention that the provisions requiring notice to each affected unit and reference to the retaliation prohibition exist to protect property owners such as Gonzalez. Because these provisions are intended for the informational benefit of tenants, Gonzalez is in no position to rely on them as a basis for invalidating the receivership orders. (McGee, supra, 19 Cal.3d at p. 962; People v. Gonzales, supra, 188 Cal.App.3d at p. 590.) 7