section 17980

Citation: section 17980
Parent Document: City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2008-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2567465/city-of-santa-monica-v-gonzalez/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (159)

City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
Section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980
section 17980

Full Text

375 chars

Gonzalez next argues the trial court’s appointment of a receiver on January 6, 2005, was improperly predicated on the City’s May 21, 2002 Notice, which he claims did not meet the notice and content requirements of section 17980.6 in the following particulars. First, the May 21, 2002 document bore the caption “Notice and Order to Comply,” instead of “Order or Notice to *922