Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)

Citation
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Parent Document
City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-05-19

Other Sections in This Document (159)

Full Text

666 chars
The City did not take a position on the receiver’s application to pursue demolition. Gonzalez, however, filed an opposition that simply expressed his “fervent wish” to remain living at the property with his family and to spare the residence from demolition. He claimed he should be permitted to make that choice, even though it “may not necessarily be ‘the best investment.’ ” Gonzalez did not make any showing regarding his ability to pay for the repairs or management of the property in the future. Previously, however, he had filed a declaration in the action stating he was unemployed and had no other assets or income apart from rental income from the property.