City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)

Citation: City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Parent Document: City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2008-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2567465/city-of-santa-monica-v-gonzalez/ ↗

Full Text

796 chars

Thereafter, Gonzalez applied to the Court of Appeal for a stay of all trial court proceedings and appealed both the January 6, 2005 order appointing the receiver and the May 2, 2005 order granting the receiver’s application. He also petitioned for a writ of mandate/prohibition to invalidate the order appointing the receiver and all subsequent orders. As relevant here, Gonzalez contended the order of appointment violated his due process rights and was void because the City failed to issue an order or notice to repair or abate in conformance with sections 17980.6 and 17980.7. Because the appointment order was void, he argued, the subsequent order authorizing the receiver to contract for demolition also was void, and even if not void, such authorization constituted an abuse of discretion.

Other Sections in This Document (159)

Full Text