section 17980

Citation: section 17980
Parent Document: City of Santa Monica v. Gonzalez, 182 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2008-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2567465/city-of-santa-monica-v-gonzalez/ ↗

Full Text

824 chars

Repair or Abate.” Second, the document did not identify either section 17980.6 or section 17980.7 among the numerous claimed code violations, and did not contain information explaining that the lessor cannot retaliate against a lessee pursuant to Civil Code section 1942.5 (§ 17980.6, subd. (c)). Third, the City did not comply with section 17980.6’s provisions for conspicuous posting and/or first-class mailing of the document. Fourth, the May 21, 2002 Notice made no reference to the City’s intent to seek a receivership in 2004, or to the January 6, 2005 receivership hearing, or to any code or ordinance violations existing on his property at any point in time between June 21, 2004 (when the City returned to inspect his property for compliance with the May 21, 2002 Notice), and the subsequent receivership hearing. 6

Other Sections in This Document (159)

Full Text