Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)

Citation
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Parent Document
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2024-11-01

Other Sections in This Document (102)

Full Text

347 chars
As noted above, Defendant makes two arguments regarding this matter. First, he argues
that the rent increase during the initial rental term was unlawful. And second, he argues
that the rent increase is not authorized under the LIHTC-related covenant. In the
context of the rent escrow hearing both arguments are directly related to the validity of