Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)

Citation
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Parent Document
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2024-11-01

Other Sections in This Document (102)

Full Text

598 chars
Defendant’s second argument is that Plaintiff has failed to properly establish that the
rent increase was proper in light of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit limitations. This
argument must fail because it is not “beyond doubt” that Plaintiff cannot establish facts
or circumstances that would entitle Plaintiff to relief. 32 Intervale, LLC v. City of
Burlington, 2026 VT 9, ¶ 21. In other words, the complaint does not facially and
inarguably establish an unauthorized rent increase was imposed. Plaintiff may be able to
establish that the rent increase fell within the applicable income limitations.