pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)

Citation: pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Parent Document: pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2024-11-01
Original Source: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/20324 ↗

Full Text

795 chars

“The requirement to provide notice of termination to the tenant that the landlord
intends to terminate the lease for non-payment is to provide protection for the tenant
against arbitrary and immediate terminations, and to afford the tenant the opportunity
to cure any deficiency.” Swanson v. Gilmartin, 2012 WL 13257779, at *2 (Vt. Super. Ct.,
Orange Civ. Div. May 03, 2012) (Eaton, Supr. J.). See also, Giancola v. Boyd, 2024 WL
5159642, at *3 (Vt. Super. Ct. Rut. Civ. Div. Dec. 10, 2024) (Burke, Supr. J.). (“[t]he
purpose of a notice of termination is to give notice to a tenant that their tenancy is being
terminated”). The Vermont Supreme Court has not held that a notice of termination
must include specific information about the right to cure. The Superior Courts are split
on the issue.

Other Sections in This Document (102)

Full Text