Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)

Citation
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Parent Document
pe2 housing v baker, No. 25-cv-5036 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2024-11-01

Other Sections in This Document (102)

Full Text

493 chars
Continued possession after termination of the lease is a necessary predicate to subject
matter jurisdiction over an ejectment action. Andrus, supra. It is “quite impossible” that
the Legislature intended to create a mechanism for landlords to obtain a judgment for
and a writ of possession in circumstances where the superior court lacks jurisdiction
over the ejectment proceeding. Thus, this court concludes that a landlord seeking an
order for a tenant to pay rent into court must establish: