Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Abril-Rivera v. Johnson, 806 F.3d 599 (2015)

Citation
Abril-Rivera v. Johnson, 806 F.3d 599 (2015)
Parent Document
Abril-Rivera v. Johnson, 806 F.3d 599 (2015)
Effective Date
2015-11-17

Other Sections in This Document (839)

Full Text

285 chars
We hold that plaintiffs have failed to make the requisite showing that the *609purported adverse employment activity was causally connected to any protected activity, much less that protected activity was a “but for” cause of the rotational staffing plan or the closing of the PR-NPSC.