State v. Brooks, 960 S.W.2d 479 (1997)

Citation: State v. Brooks, 960 S.W.2d 479 (1997)
Parent Document: State v. Brooks, 960 S.W.2d 479 (1997)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1997-12-23
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2427881/state-v-brooks/ ↗

Full Text

681 chars

Appellant’s claims and those similar to his have been repeatedly rejected both because proportionality review is not constitutionally required and because this Court’s practices do not violate rights to due process. See State v. Carter, 955 S.W.2d 548, 561 (Mo. banc 1997); State v. Simmons, 944 S.W.2d 165, 190 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 376, 139 L.Ed.2d 293 (1997); State v. Basile, 942 S.W.2d 342, 361 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 213, 139 L.Ed.2d 148 (1997); Taylor, 929 S.W.2d at 223; Weaver, 912 S.W.2d at 522; Ramsey, 864 S.W.2d at 327-28; State v. Whitfield, 837 S.W.2d 503, 514-15 (Mo. banc 1992); State v. Schneider, 736 S.W.2d at 398.

Other Sections in This Document (214)

Full Text