Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)

Citation
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Parent Document
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2005-04-12

Other Sections in This Document (84)

Full Text

669 chars
Here, merely because Enterprise decided to postpone its IPO should not diminish Dunn’s claim that he was terminated from his employment for reporting Enterprise’s accounting practices that were not in compliance with federal securities regulations. Even though Enterprise’s actions ultimately did not violate federal securities regulations because it did not file the necessary IPO documents with the SEC, Dunn could still demonstrate at trial that he had a reasonable belief Enterprise would have violated securities laws by filing financial statements with the SEC that were not prepared according to GAAP, and that Enterprise intended to do so promptly. See Johnson,