Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)

Citation
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Parent Document
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2005-04-12

Other Sections in This Document (84)

Full Text

525 chars
In his first point on appeal, Dunn argues the trial court erred in granting Enterprise’s motion for directed verdict on his claim that he was wrongfully discharged in violation of public policy for refusing to perform an illegal act. Dunn contends he presented sufficient evidence to make a submissible case that he was wrongfully terminated because he refused to prepare financial statements for Enterprise’s proposed IPO that were not in accordance with GAAP, and which he reasonably believed would violate SEC regulations.