Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)

Citation
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Parent Document
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2005-04-12

Other Sections in This Document (84)

Full Text

883 chars
Thomas P. Dunn (“Dunn”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company’s (“Enterprise”) motions for directed verdict on Dunn’s claim that he was wrongfully discharged for refusing to violate the law or a clear mandate of public policy, and on his claim that he was wrongfully discharged in violation of public policy for reporting conduct by Enterprise that he reasonably believed violated federal securities laws. Dunn also appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Enterprise’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative, for a new trial, after the jury returned a verdict of $4,000,000 in favor of Dunn on his claim that he was wrongfully discharged in violation of public policy for reporting Enterprise’s illegal business practices in Missouri and other states. We reverse and remand in part, and affirm in part.