Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)

Citation
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Parent Document
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2005-04-12

Other Sections in This Document (84)

Full Text

754 chars
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Dunn, we find Dunn presented sufficient evidence at trial that the conduct he was asked to engage in with respect to Enterprise’s financial statements in preparation for the IPO would have been in violation of federal securities regulations and a clear mandate of public policy as enunciated in those regulations. Dunn also presented sufficient evidence at trial that linked his termination from Enterprise with his failure to perform this unlawful conduct. Because we find Dunn made a submissible case on this cause of action, the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict on this claim. We reverse and remand this point for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Point I is granted.