Section 213
- Citation
- Section 213
- Parent Document
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-12-19
Other Sections in This Document (72)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
- Section 213
Full Text
666 charsUnder section 213.070, retaliation must be given a broader meaning; this is because section 213.070 does not limit itself to the employer-employee relationship. Thus, retaliation exists under section 213.070 when (1) a person files a complaint, testifies, assists or participates in an investigation, proceeding or hearing conducted pursuant to chapter 213 and (2), as a direct result, he or she suffers any damages due to an act of reprisal. This Court cannot judicially impose a requirement outside of the plain language in section 213.070. Here, the trial court applied *626the wrong legal standard for determining if retaliation occurred under that section. III.