Section 523
- Citation
- Section 523
- Parent Document
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1992-11-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2431294/state-v-muegge/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
- Section 523
Full Text
362 charsHowever, the trial court’s failure to hear the motion within thirty days was not fatal to its jurisdiction. Because § 523.053(2), RSMo.1986, utilizes the word “shall”, Wilson assumes that the statute is, therefore, mandatory. While the use of the word “shall” in a statute will generally be interpreted as mandatory, such is not always the case. Howard v. Banks,