DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-3505

Citation
§ 42-3505
Parent Document
Reshard v. Stevenson (2022)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2022-02-24
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6444934/reshard-v-stevenson/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (262)

Full Text

586 chars 
20
            Because Judge Johnson has since retired and left the court, this
determination will necessarily be made by a different judge. We leave to the court’s
discretion on remand whether an adequate inquiry in these circumstances requires
an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Wylie, 143 A.3d at 84 (noting that “[t]he adequacy of a
trial court’s inquiry depends on the nature of the issues before the court” and
concluding that an evidentiary hearing was required on that record because the trial
court “need[ed] to make credibility determinations and resolve material disputes of
fact”).