DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-3505

Citation
§ 42-3505
Parent Document
Reshard v. Stevenson (2022)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2022-02-24
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6444934/reshard-v-stevenson/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (262)

Full Text

678 chars 
18
         Ms. Reshard’s reply also asserted that Ms. Stevenson’s counsel engaged in
ongoing misrepresentations about Ms. Reshard not having obtained counsel.
Relatedly, Ms. Reshard has asserted that Ms. Stevenson’s counsel violated a
purported agreement to defer any eviction until there was a ruling on the Rule 60(b)
motion. See supra note 7. These claims may affect the trial court’s analysis of the
Starling factors under Rule 60(b)(1), but the trial court should also consider on
remand whether they raise issues of “misrepresentation[] or misconduct by [the]
opposing party” within the meaning of Super. Ct. Civ. R. 60(b)(3).
                                         19