Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)

Citation: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Parent Document: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2008-07-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4945301/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Full Text

879 chars

Although the tenants also contend that the trial court erred by dismissing park owners Kevin and Kari Ware, ruling that LME’s unacknowledged leases did not violate the statute of fraud, granting partial summary judgment as to a CPA violation regarding the security gate, granting partial summary judgment dismissing retaliation claims, and excluding the tenants’ expert witness, they fail to argue these assignments of error in their brief. Because the tenants do not support these assignments of error with argument, consideration is waived on appeal. RAP 10.3(a)(6); Bercier v. Kiga, 127 Wn. App. 809, 824, 103 P.3d 232 (2004). In addition, to the extent the tenants do not make arguments related to the assignments of error to the court’s findings and conclusions, those arguments are also waived. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley, 118 Wn.2d 801, 809, 828 P.2d 549 (1992).

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text