Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)

Citation: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Parent Document: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2008-07-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4945301/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Full Text

739 chars

*560¶23 This court’s primary goal in interpreting statutes is “to ascertain and give effect to legislative intent.” Pac. Health Ctr., 135 Wn. App. at 158-59. The plain language of RCW 59.20.073(1) provides that tenants have the right to assign their rental agreements and does not contain any limitation on the right to do so. When the plain language of the statute is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, we look to the principles of statutory construction, legislative history, and case law. Cockle v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 142 Wn.2d 801, 808, 16 P.3d 583 (2001). And when enacting a statute, we presume the legislature knows the existing state of the case law. Woodson v. State, 95 Wn.2d 257, 262, 623 P.2d 683 (1980).

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text