Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)

Citation: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Parent Document: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2008-07-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4945301/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Full Text

785 chars

¶14 We review summary judgment de novo and engage in the same inquiry as the trial court. Heath v. Uraga, 106 Wn. App. 506, 512, 24 P.3d 413 (2001). Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, answers, and admissions, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. CR 56(c). We view the facts and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Michak v. Transnation Title Ins. Co., 148 Wn.2d 788, 794, 64 P.3d 22 (2003). Summary judgment is appropriate if, in view of all the *557evidence, reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion. Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wn.2d 476, 485, 824 P.2d 483 (1992). ManufacturedlMobile Home Landlord Tenant Act

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text