Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)

Citation: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Parent Document: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 146 Wash. App. 546 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2008-07-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4945301/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Full Text

921 chars

¶30 The tenants contend that even if the written lease is enforceable, they did not agree to the terms of Attachments A and B, which were not attached to the lease when they were executed. We review the trial court’s decision in a bench trial to determine whether challenged *562findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the findings support the conclusions of law. Dorsey v. King County, 51 Wn. App. 664, 668-69, 754 P.2d 1255 (1988). Findings of fact are considered verities on appeal as long as they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. In re Marriage of Thomas, 63 Wn. App. 658, 660, 821 P.2d 1227 (1991). “Substantial evidence” is a quantum of evidence sufficient to persuade a rational, fair-minded person that the premise is true. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass’n v. Chelan County, 141 Wn.2d 169, 176, 4 P.3d 123 (2000). The tenants did not assign error to the following findings of fact:

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text