DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)

Citation
Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)
Parent Document
Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2012-12-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489763/goodwin-v-franklin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

624 chars 
3
        The effect of lack of water on the Tenants is that they have no water for drinking,
bathing, cooking, doing dishes, or watering their beef cow, “T-Bone.” They cannot keep
their bodies or clothes clean, and face the humiliation of being dirty and smelly as a
result. They have difficulty keeping the toilet free of waste as there is often no water to
flush. Ms. Norrie testified that they were normally poor but clean, but the effect of this
was to make them “dirty poor.” They have to go to gas stations to use the toilet facilities.
They have to haul 30–40 gallons of water per week to keep their beef cow alive.