Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)

Citation: Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)
Parent Document: Goodwin v. Franklin (2012)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2012-12-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489763/goodwin-v-franklin/ ↗

Full Text

702 chars

2
Agreement, which provided that Landlord would go home “directly and immediately
restore water service to the Goodwins.” It further provided that he would, at all times,
provide “uninterrupted water sufficient in quantity and pressure to meet the ordinary
needs” of Tenants’ family, and that if Landlord discontinued or interrupted water service
at any time and the fact was verified by specified persons, Landlord would be
incarcerated until further order of the Court. Landlord stipulated that he had the present
ability to provide water to the Tenants as required by the agreement. The Court ordered
Landlord to pay sanctions of $1,407.94 for attorney’s fees related to the second contempt
motion.

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text