Sullivan v. Lazzari, 43 A.3d 750 (2012)

Citation: Sullivan v. Lazzari, 43 A.3d 750 (2012)
Parent Document: Sullivan v. Lazzari, 43 A.3d 750 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-05-29
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2294526/sullivan-v-lazzari/ ↗

Full Text

968 chars

Furthermore, we note that the defendants were permitted to cross-examine extensively the plaintiffs witnesses, H. Mark DeAngelis, the state marshal who served the notice to quit, and the plaintiff, the conservator of Fryer, who owned the premises. After Anthony Lazzari finished cross-examining the plaintiff, Kimberly Albright-Lazzari cross-examined her. The defendants also were permitted to present their own case, in which they both testified as to their version of the events. The defendants did not contest that the plaintiff was the conservator of Fryer, the owner of the premises, that the plaintiff gave them permission to live in the house, that they did not sign a lease, that they later were requested to leave or that they were served with a notice to quit. It is by no means clear how additional evidence could have advanced the defendants’ cause. The defendants were given their day in court and were given the due process to which they were entitled. V

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text