Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)

Citation: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Parent Document: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131861/altavista-investments-llc-v-makeeva/ ↗

Full Text

789 chars

for both permissive intervention and intervention as a
         matter of right. . . . Therefore, under the second
         prong of Curcio, whether the trial court’s action on a
         motion to intervene is appealable depends on whether
         intervention is an absolute right or a matter within the
         trial court’s discretion. . . . [A]n unsuccessful appli-
         cant for intervention in the trial court does not have a
         final judgment from which to appeal unless he can make
         a colorable claim to intervention as a matter of right.9
         If he does make such a colorable claim, on appeal the
         court has jurisdiction to adjudicate both his claim to
         intervention as a matter of right and to permissive inter-
         vention.10 . . .

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text