Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)

Citation: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Parent Document: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131861/altavista-investments-llc-v-makeeva/ ↗

Full Text

1,084 chars

Rather than turning directly to the merits of the
         appeal, Baotou, in its appellate brief, first addresses a
         threshold issue, namely, whether this appeal was taken
         from an appealable final judgment. See In re Santiago
         G., 325 Conn. 221, 228, 157 A.3d 60 (2017) (‘‘[u]nless a
         specific right to appeal otherwise has been provided
         by statute, we must always determine the threshold
         question of whether the appeal is taken from a final
         judgment before considering the merits of the claim’’
           6
             On March 7, 2024, the plaintiff filed a caseflow request asking the court
         to hold a hearing to distribute the $336,000 in use and occupancy payments
         currently held by the court. Baotou filed an objection arguing that the court
         should not hold a hearing until this court resolved its appeal regarding
         Baotou’s right to intervene. The court sustained Baotou’s objection.
0, 0                         CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                     Page 7

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text