Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)

Citation: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Parent Document: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131861/altavista-investments-llc-v-makeeva/ ↗

Full Text

1,260 chars

WESTBROOK, J. In the underlying summary process
       eviction action (eviction action), the trial court ren-
       dered a judgment of possession against the defendant
       Leyla Makeeva and seven other defendants, in favor of
       the plaintiff, Altavista Investments, LLC.1 See Altavista
         1
           In addition to Makeeva, the following additional parties were named as
       defendants in the underlying eviction action: Vladimir Lenskiy, Valerian
       Lenskiy, Zinaida Lenskaya, Stanislav V. Lenskiy, Anastasia Lenskiy, Vitaly
       Lenskiy, Ilana Lenskiy, and four additional occupants noticed by aliases in
       accordance with General Statutes § 47a-23 (b). The action later was with-
       drawn as to the unnamed defendants, and the court rendered judgment
       against Stanislav V. Lenskiy, Anastasia Lenskiy, Vitaly Lenskiy, and Ilana
       Lenskiy for failure to appear.
         Neither the plaintiff nor any of the defendants filed a brief or otherwise
       participated in the present appeal, and, consequently, this court issued an
       order that they would not be permitted to participate in oral arguments and
Page 2                          CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                       0, 0

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text