Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)

Citation: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Parent Document: Altavista Investments, LLC v. Makeeva, 226 Conn. App. 175 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131861/altavista-investments-llc-v-makeeva/ ↗

Full Text

910 chars

The court scheduled a hearing on Baotou’s motion
         to intervene for August 29, 2023. The court subsequently
         issued an order denying the motion to intervene. The
         court provided the following rationale for its ruling:
         ‘‘[Baotou] seeks to assert a money damages claim or a
         right to money held by the clerk in this [eviction] action
         for possession. [Baotou] is not the owner of the subject
         property nor able to terminate the possessory interest
         of the defendant[s] through eviction as authorized in a
         summary process action. Its claims for the money held
         by the clerk’s office are based on contract principles
         and privity against the plaintiff . . . . As [Baotou] does
         not seek a possessory interest in the subject property,
         it is not a proper party to this action.’’ This appeal
         followed.6

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text