Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Citation
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Parent Document
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-09-10
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
Full Text
1,002 charsNor was there other evidence establishing the existence of an agency relationship between Lindquist and Shepard. "An agency relationship is created when there is mutual consent, express or implied, that the agent is to act on behalf and for the benefit of the principal, and subject to the principal's control." Theos & Sons, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 431 Mass. 736, 742 (2000), citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 1 (1958). See Cabrera v. Jakabovitz, 24 F.3d 372, 386 (2d Cir. 1994) (applying Restatement [Second] of Agency § 1 comment b definition of agency to claim under Fair Housing Act). These hallmarks are missing here. With regard to the parking issue, Lindquist has no control over where people park on a public street, nor was there evidence that Shepard parked in Stella's usual spot at Lindquist's behest. Likewise, with regard to use of the back yard, there was no evidence to support a finding that Lindquist had control over Shepard's behavior or that he was acting on her behalf.9