Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Citation
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Parent Document
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-09-10
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
Full Text
1,096 charsDiscussion. "On review of a jury-waived proceeding, we accept the judge's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous." South Boston Elderly Residences, Inc. v. Moynahan, 91 Mass. App. Ct. 455, 462 (2017), quoting from U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Schumacher, 467 Mass. 421, 427 (2014). A finding is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence to support it or when "although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744, 747 (2005), quoting from United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948). In this case the judge adopted a majority of Stella's proposed findings and some of Lindquist's proposed findings and issued rulings of law. Although this was permissible, we apply "stricter scrutiny" to the judge's adopted findings because we have doubt whether they "are the product of [her] independent judgment." Cormier v. Carty, 381 Mass. 234, 237-238 (1980). See Adoption of Abby, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 816, 817 (2005).