Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Citation
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018) 4.
- Parent Document
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-09-10
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
- Lindquist v. Stella, 111 N.E.3d 304 (2018)
Full Text
631 chars4. Discrimination. Stella brought his discrimination claim under both G. L. c. 151B and the Federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (2012). The judge ruled in Stella's favor on two grounds. First, she concluded that "when [Lindquist's] agent [Shepard] began to park in a space consistently used by [Stella] due to the proximity to the building and [Stella's] limited mobility, [Lindquist] engaged in or allowed discriminatory activity to occur." Second, she concluded that "[Lindquist] and her agent engaged in discriminatory activity when they restricted [Stella's] use of the back yard due to his son's disabilities."7