Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)

Citation: Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)
Parent Document: Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1994-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2263659/apartment-assn-of-greater-los-a... ↗

Full Text

722 chars

whether rental units are comparable. The commission eventually determined that peculiar circumstances caused Ms. Simonson’s base rents to be disproportionately low. (223 Cal.App.3d at p. 1347.) In fixing the increased rent, however, the commission rejected her evidence of comparable rents on the ground that the evidence was incomplete. The commission ruled that Ms. Simonson should have presented evidence of the actual expenses of buildings, the amount of return generated by other buildings, and the relationship of the expenses and return to Ms. Simonson’s expenses and return. The commission proceeded to simply set a new base rent date, one which reflected the increased rents set by Ms. Simonson’s manager. (Ibid.)

Other Sections in This Document (64)

Full Text