Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)

Citation: Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)
Parent Document: Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1730 (1994)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1994-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2263659/apartment-assn-of-greater-los-a... ↗

Full Text

517 chars

went on to hold that the Berkeley rent control law was constitutionally deficient because it “drastically and unnecessarily” restricted the rent control board’s ability to adjust rents. “[A]n adjustment mechanism is constitutionally necessary to provide for changes in circumstances and also provide for the previously mentioned situations in which the base rent cannot reasonably be deemed to reflect general market conditions.” (Id. at p. 169.) That factual situation was presented in Vega v. City of West Hollywood

Other Sections in This Document (64)

Full Text