Danger Panda, LLC v. Launiu, 10 Cal. App. 5th 502 (2017)

Citation: Danger Panda, LLC v. Launiu, 10 Cal. App. 5th 502 (2017)
Parent Document: Danger Panda, LLC v. Launiu, 10 Cal. App. 5th 502 (2017)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2017-04-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4380722/danger-panda-llc-v-launiu/ ↗

Full Text

1,506 chars

4
Section 37.9(a)(13), in addition to all rights under any other provisions of law, shall be
entitled to receive $4,500 before vacating the premises.‖ (Id. at p. 5.) As before,
landlords were required to make separate fixed payments to elderly or disabled tenants.
This version of the relocation assistance benefit required that payments due ―for any unit
which is occupied by more than one tenant shall be divided equally among all the
occupying tenants excluding those tenants‖ who were separately entitled to payments
because of their elderly or disabled status. (Id. at p. 5.)4
       In December 2004, the board of supervisors amended section 39.9A to eliminate
the limitation restricting payment of relocation assistance to low income, elderly and
disabled tenants. (Ord. No. 21-05, File No. 041151 (Dec. 14, 2004), p. 15.)5 For Ellis
Act evictions commenced after the effective date of these amendments (February 20,
2005), relocation payments were required to be paid in accordance with section 37.9A(e)
subsection (3) (section 37.9A(e)(3)), the terms of which are at issue in this appeal. (Id. at
p. 17; see also Rent Ordinance, § 37.9A(e)(3).)
       Under section 37.9A(e)(3), ―each tenant shall be entitled to receive $4,500.00,
one-half of which shall be paid at the time of the service of the notice of termination of
tenancy, and one-half of which shall be paid when the tenant vacates the unit.‖ (Rent
Ordinance, § 37.9A(e)(3)(A).) However, if there are ―more than three tenants in a unit,

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text