De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Citation
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Parent Document
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2026-01-27
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
Full Text
343 chars15
termination. After terminating Rosales, plaintiff did in fact serve her with a 30-day notice to
quit. However, that plaintiff chose to give defendants notice does not change the fact that they
were entitled to none.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded costs on appeal.