De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Citation
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Parent Document
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2026-01-27
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
- De Paolo v. Rosales (2026)
Full Text
193 chars3
The determination of whether defendant was a licensee or tenant at sufferance is not
dispositive to the resolution of this appeal. (Borden v. Stiles, supra, 92 Cal.App.5th at p. 348.)