Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1942

Citation
Section 1942
Parent Document
Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1970-11-10

Other Sections in This Document (98)

Full Text

738 chars
Moreover, as one commentator has pointed out, "judicial prohibition of *519 retaliatory evictions [and rent increases] raises a host of problems which it may be difficult for the courts to resolve consistently." (82 Harv.L.Rev. 932.) For example, what will a landlord who is found to have raised the rent in retaliation for filing a notice under Civil Code section 1942 be required to show in order to prove that his illegal motive has "dissipated?" If he seeks to raise the rent within a month or two of a finding of retaliation, will a claim that he merely wants to increase his return from the dwelling be sufficient, or will he have to demonstrate that there is some other economic justification, such as higher taxes, for the action?