Section 1942
- Citation
- Section 1942
- Parent Document
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1970-11-10
Other Sections in This Document (98)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Section 1941
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1941
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
Full Text
685 chars"The purpose of the general rule, that neither a counterclaim nor a cross complaint is admissible in an action of unlawful detainer, is to prevent tenants who have violated the covenants of their leases from frustrating the ordinary and summary remedy provided by statute for the restitution of the premises.... However, as the court stated in McCue v. Bradbury, 149 Cal. 108, at p. 113 [84 P. 993], `... equity will refuse to enforce a forfeiture at the instance of one who has obtained the strictly legal right to it by fraud, deceit, or any form of oppressive practice; and, upon the other hand, will relieve the innocent when such a forfeiture so secured is sought to be enforced.'