Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Citation
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Parent Document
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1970-11-10
Other Sections in This Document (98)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)
- Section 1941
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1941
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
Full Text
1,107 charsPetitioner appealed to the Alameda County Superior Court which held a trial de novo. Judgment was again rendered in favor of the landlord for restitution of the premises and $29.55 plus costs. Although the court expressed agreement with petitioner that the landlord’s rent increase and eviction action had been intended as retaliation against petitioner for as*511sorting his statutory rights, the court rejected, as a matter of law, petitioner’s defense that such retaliatory evictions violated public policy. In essence, the court concluded that Civil Code sections 1941 and 1942 impose no limit on the power of landlords to raise rents and evict tenants in retaliation for the exercise by the tenants of their rights under those sections. Nonetheless, the court certified the case to the Court of Appeal to determine a question of law of statewide importance: may a tenant defend an unlawful detainer action on the ground that his landlord increased the rents and commenced the eviction action in retaliation against him because he made a demand for repairs pursuant to Civil Code sections 1941 and 1942?