Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 3513

Citation
§ 3513
Parent Document
Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-10-29

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

625 chars
(1993) 4 Cal.4th 1116, 1128 [17 Cal.Rptr.2d 365, 847 P.2d 45].) Tenant’s contention challenging the jury’s verdict that he breached the settlement agreement runs afoul of that rule. The verdict form did not identify the jury’s reasons for finding tenant had breached paragraph 6(b) of the settlement agreement. Indeed, tenant acknowledges that the record does not reveal which theory the jury adopted. Even assuming the prohibition against reporting landlord to city officials is void, the verdict still stands because the record does not affirmatively show the jury relied on improper grounds. 4. Retaliation Cause of Action