§ 3513
- Citation
- § 3513
- Parent Document
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-10-29
Other Sections in This Document (66)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
Full Text
458 charsTenant contends the trial court’s finding that landlord had restored the property as of November 2004 to its original condition of a single-family residence was error. He argued the finding violated the res judicata effect of Judge Abrams’s conclusion that the property was a duplex. He cites no authority, however, that a property’s condition cannot change. It follows, therefore, that, at least theoretically, Judge Abrams’s finding that the property *1374